- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:43:15 +0100
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Hello www-svg, > The following conformance criteria in section 1.6: > > property > A parameter that helps specify how a document should be rendered. > > ...seems extremely vague. We agree its vague. We looked in CSS2 and in the CSS 2.12 working draft, but there is no definition of a property there either: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/conform.html#q1 > It is very unclear what thue requirement > actually is. It is also unclear why this is a SHOULD rather than a MUST. > My guess is that this was not intended to be a conformance requirement, in > which case I would strongly recommend either marking the section as > non-normative (as per an earlier comment) or using a word other than > "should" here (since "should" is defined in section D.2 as meaning "there > may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a particular > item, but the full implications must be understood and carefully weighed > before choosing a different course". We agree and have removed the "should". -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2005 15:43:25 UTC