- From: Doug Schepers <doug@schepers.cc>
- Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:02:27 -0500
- To: "'Antoine Quint'" <ml@graougraou.com>, "'Robin Berjon'" <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Cc: <www-svg@w3.org>
Hey- Okay, all very enlightening. | >> Should my implementation (and others) ignore it, and adhere to the | >> Specs? Or should we support it, and support the existing content? | > | > I would recommend not supporting it, and seeing if your users | > complain. | | As far as I know, "prev" is not in any recommendation, so it | should be safely ignored. I guess I'll remove support for 'prev'. Anyway, it's just about as easy to say: <animate id="myAnim1" .../> <animate begin="myAnim1.end" .../> As: <animate .../> <animate begin="prev.end" .../> I was a little concerned about how I was going to deal with DOM reordering issues anyway. Ids don't have that problem... ;) Thanks, guys. Regards- Doug doug.schepers@vectoreal.com www.vectoreal.com ...for scalable solutions.
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2005 04:02:38 UTC