- From: Antoine Quint <ml@graougraou.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:34:03 -0800
- To: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Cc: Doug Schepers <doug@schepers.cc>, <www-svg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2005 03:34:15 UTC
Hi guys, On 7 nov. 2005, at 00:56, Robin Berjon wrote: > On Nov 07, 2005, at 09:42, Doug Schepers wrote: >> Ok, I suspected that might be the case. So, what should I do? >> There's lots >> of content out there that uses it, since it was part of the >> original Adobe >> tutorials back in the early days, and has been on various sites. > > It's the first time I see it in years of using SVG, is there really > "lots" of content out there using it? I've used it in the past, it got ditched from SMIL 2.0 before it went to recommendation, which is quite a while after Adobe started shipping their SVG Viewer which implemented it. >> Should my implementation (and others) ignore it, and adhere to the >> Specs? Or >> should we support it, and support the existing content? > > I would recommend not supporting it, and seeing if your users > complain. As far as I know, "prev" is not in any recommendation, so it should be safely ignored. Antoine -- Antoine Quint — Fuchsia Design SVG & Client-side XML Consulting W3C SVG WG Invited Expert http://fuchsia-design.com
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2005 03:34:15 UTC