- From: Craig Northway <craign@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 13:42:25 +1000
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-svg@w3.org
Hi Bjoern, As I said in my response [1] to Ian's comment: [SVGMobile12] Conformance criteria The working group have assigned actions for several people to review the entire specification to ensure that as you say, conformance criteria are actually conformance criteria. I have been allocated this particular section and will make sure that the language is clear when statements are intended to be normative. I'm sure after this is done you'd like to read this section before deciding whether you accept the working groups response to your comment, :-) . At the moment the group has no intentions of extending this feature in SVG Full 1.2. This feature will of course be included in SVG Full 1.2. Regards, Craig 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005May/0208.html Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >Dear Scalable Vector Graphics Working Group, > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20050413/interact.html >section 13.9 is not really readable, I fail to see where it attempts >to define something and where it attempts to explain something. What >is clear is that this section discusses something with great potential, > >[...] > It is possible to override ... > it is possible to define ... > it is possible to specify ... > it is possible to navigate ... > it is possible to specify ... > It is not possible to navigate ... > It is possible to navigate ... > It is possible to navigate ... > it should be possible to click ... >[...] > >I think this section is not reviewable. Please change the draft such >that this section is easily reviewable, of particular interest is how >the section extends to SVG "Full". Also, please change the draft that >at least one example for each concept is included. > >regards. > >
Received on Thursday, 2 June 2005 03:42:32 UTC