- From: Jon Ferraiolo <jonf@adobe.com>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:00:20 -0800
- To: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-svg@w3.org>
Bjoern, I agree that we should reword the sentence "To be scalable, SVG content must include a 'viewBox' attribute on the 'svg' element." Even without a viewBox (and thus without adjusting the size of the graphic to fit the viewport), an SVG graphic is still scalable in the sense that the rendering of the graphic adjusts to the resolution and color depth of the target device. Jon -----Original Message----- From: www-svg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-svg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bjoern Hoehrmann Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 2:36 AM To: Chris Lilley Cc: www-svg@w3.org Subject: Re: SVG12: 5.1.2 "referenced document" * Chris Lilley wrote: >Hello www-svg, I note that responses that formally address comments must be sent to the reviewer and the list, not just the list... >BH> Please change the draft such that it is clear which "referenced >BH> document" is referred to here. If this means that all <svg> elements >BH> are required to specify a viewBox attribute then I suggest this >BH> requirement be dropped. > >We agree and have removed the "referenced document" wording. Please let >us know within two weeks if this does not satisfy your comment. The new text has "To be scalable, SVG content must include a 'viewBox' attribute on the 'svg' element." So SVG is really for scalable and un- scalable vector graphics? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Saturday, 31 December 2005 15:59:20 UTC