Re: SVG12: namespace-illformed fragments

* Robin Berjon wrote:
>this is a reply to your comments at:
>
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005May/0205.html
>
>The draft has been modified to explicitly mention all of XML 1.0, XML  
>1.1, and namespace well-formedness. The processing of elements from  
>other namespaces has been clarified.

I ain't cool with this response, the draft now requires namespace-
wellformedness as per Namespaces in XML 1.1 in several places; this
rules out use of XML 1.0 in most if not all cases; that's quite
undesirable, I don't think it should do that.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

Received on Wednesday, 28 December 2005 23:20:07 UTC