- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 02:58:06 +0100
- To: "Jon Ferraiolo" <jonf@adobe.com>
- Cc: <www-svg@w3.org>
* Jon Ferraiolo wrote:
>This is the SVG WG response to you're the thread that begins with:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005Apr/0234.html
>And where your last response (copied below) was:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005May/0258.html
>
>Thanks for your follow-on comments on this issue. We agree that
>unqualified event names belong in the XML Events namespace. We have
>reviewed the specification to make sure that it is clear that this is
>true. The latest draft now says the 'event' attribute can only accept a
>particular discrete set of event names (with a hyperlink to a section
>which provides the list of values), and then the referenced section now
>says that all of the events that are allowed are in the XML Events
>namespace.
The current draft is more confused in this regard than the previous one.
To mention just one problem, the definition is
ev:event = "<string>"
The name of the event to handle. This attribute is in the XML
Events namespace. See event list for a list of all supported
events and [XML-Events] for the definition of the ev:event
attribute.
And the draft uses syntax like ev:event="ev:click" in examples. How
would one go from "<string>" and "as defined in XML Events" to "some
sort of qualified name, as defined in SVG Tiny 1.2"?
--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Saturday, 24 December 2005 01:57:51 UTC