- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 02:32:21 +0100
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
* Chris Lilley wrote: >BH> From http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20050413/svgudomidl.html > >BH> [...] >BH> The SVG UDOM IDL defines the model for the SVG UDOM. Note that the SVG >BH> UDOM IDL is defined such that some interfaces have more than one base >BH> class. The different standard language bindings for the SVG UDOM are >BH> responsible for defining how to map all aspects of the SVG UDOM into >BH> the given language, including how the language should implement >BH> interfaces with more than one base class. >BH> [...] > >BH> No such "standard language bindings" exist. Please change the draft such >BH> that these "standard language bindings" are included. >In that context, does the text you quoted make sense? There are no >*required* language bindings, but a couple of *standard* ones are >supplied for ECMAScript and Java. Well, if there were such bindings, I would not complain that they do not exist. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Saturday, 24 December 2005 01:32:09 UTC