- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:11:23 +0100
- To: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Cc: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, "Scott Hayman" <shayman@rim.com>, "Will Pearson" <will-pearson@tiscali.co.uk>, <www-svg@w3.org>, <wai-xtech@w3.org>
On Wednesday, December 7, 2005, 8:17:01 AM, Jonathan wrote: JC> Chris, JC> Accessibility deserves more than your filibustering. Jonathan, this is getting tiresome. I was going to reply privately to save you embarrassment, but since you chose to cross-post widely I feel it necessary to respond in public. Accessibility is important. I have already told you that there is an accessibility appendix, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005Nov/0179.html although you can't seem to find it http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005Nov/0191.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005Nov/0193.html or even read the right spec. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005Nov/0188.html In other emails, or even in other parts of emails where you complain that there is no appendix, you do find it, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005Nov/0193.html but then seem unable to follow a link to a normative section and post complaining that the appendix is informative. Other days, like today and yesterday, you merely throw insults or state that you have never had a response - which is not going to work in an archived forum. JC> On 6 Dec 2005, at 17:19, Chris Lilley wrote: JC> On Tuesday, December 6, 2005, 8:02:43 AM, Jonathan wrote: JC>> I also wrote recently to Chris and yourself regarding this issue, JC>> but failed to receive any response. Also mentioning other relevant JC>> accessibility failings in SVG. JC> Actually you did get several responses, for example I pointed out that JC> you were looking in the wrong document. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2005 09:11:44 UTC