- From: Craig Northway <craign@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 18:16:32 +1000
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Hi Bjoern, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >* Craig Northway wrote: > > >>Excuse me? They are explicitly prohibited from re-inserting nodes. This >>method now works exactly like calling removeChild/Node() from a script. >> >> > >My original comment was that there does not seem to be a definition >of "seeking backwards" in the draft yet the draft assumes specific >requirements for "seeking backwards". The same is true for the draft >plus the proposed change. If "seeking backwards" is clearly defined >in the draft it should be easy to comply with my original request >to link to that definition from the discard element definition; and >if there is no such definition, removeChild() is simply not defined >to have the impact on "seeking backwards" you describe. > > Seeking backwards is defined here: http://www.w3.org/TR/SMIL/smil-timing.html#Timing-HyperlinksAndTiming. The discard element definition will reference this section of the SMIL specification. Regards, Craig Northway
Received on Saturday, 30 April 2005 08:16:38 UTC