- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 00:59:15 +0200
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Dear Scalable Vector Graphics Working Group, http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20050413/ does not make much sense with respect to XML 1.0 vs XML 1.1. For conformance it is required that only XML 1.1 can be used to author SVG content, yet all examples in the draft are XML 1.0 documents and thus non-conforming. Support for XML 1.1 is also not required from "Conforming SVG Viewers" such that it is essentially impossible to create conforming and interoperable content. Some sections also refer to certain aspects of XML 1.0 rather than depend on the XML version of the document, for example, some things are defined to be XML Names without saying under which definition (there are four) or if an attempt is made to discuss it, XML 1.0 is referenced which means that XML 1.1 is of little use. Please subsantively revise the draft in this regard (as I've requested before...) regards. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Sunday, 17 April 2005 22:58:48 UTC