- From: Cameron McCormack <cam-www-svg@aka.mcc.id.au>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:07:24 +1000
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Jon Ferraiolo: > Oh. I have always assumed that NodeXBL only applies to element nodes, > despite its name. The sXBL specification doesn't say that NodeXBL only > applies to elements, but the way sXBL in general and NodeXBL in particular > is defined, it seems like it has to be restricted to element nodes. Once > again, I will bring this up with the XBL committee. But to allow script to traverse the flattened tree, you need NodeXBL to be implemented by other, non-element nodes, so you can access their xblPreviousSibling/xblNextSibling/etc. attributes. That, or should the interface be split into two? One for nodes which can appear in the flattened tree (NodeXBL) and another for shadowable nodes (which would contain the xblShadowTree attribute). Cameron -- Cameron McCormack | Web: http://mcc.id.au/ | ICQ: 26955922
Received on Monday, 20 September 2004 00:07:30 UTC