- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 20:04:15 +0100
- To: www-svg@w3.org
"Richard Schwerdtfeger (by way of Al Gilman)" <schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote in message news:p06110406bd70dfc9723a@[10.0.1.2]... > 1. <desc> is absent. This needs to be put back. > 2. <title> is absent. This needs to be put back. Why do you believe these are absent? They appear available to me. > 5. Support for text access > Why is tref not available for <text> tref has severe accessibility problems, I strongly believe it should not be part of the spec (it's a reliance on external data without any mechanism to provide fallback when that data is not available e.g. http://jibbering.com/2002/8/thellamas.svg .) > 7. Where is XForms support? Is this expected as an add on? XForms has a > lot of accessibility features through declarative markup. What do you feel is missing from the spec that means XForms cannot be supported - or what support means in the case of SVG Tiny? > 8. Support for meta information > > I believe the group should be considering the meta module (for which we > are adding role) as a module to both SVG 1.2 Tiny and SVG 1.2. > <http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/mod-metaAttributes.html#s_metaAttributesmodule>http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/mod-metaAttributes.html#s_metaAttributesmodule Please no, that needs an awful lot of work before it's remotely usable, and delaying SVG 1.2 Tiny to a time when that is finished and referencable seems completely unwarranted when there is already RDF support in SVG (indeed I see no reason for the HTML WG to re-invent another metadata language either, the work's already been done in other groups.) Jim.
Received on Friday, 17 September 2004 19:04:22 UTC