- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:29:43 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > > I have been unable to find a section in the latest sXBL Working Draft > that defines whether a document with [...] are "conforming", "in error", > etc. > > ... > <xbl:xbl foo = "bar" ...> > ... This is obviously not conforming XBL, since there is no "foo" attribute defined for the "xbl" element in the XBL namespace. However, it is not in error (and the SVG rules for handling errors thus doesn't apply), since the spec doesn't say it is in error. In XBL2 the error handling rules will be quite different (namely, the default error handling behaviour should be the HTML- and CSS- style "muddle on through", albeit with much more strictly defined mechanisms for doing the muddling on; host languages like SVG will however be able to define stricter rules when XBL is used inside documents that use their namespace, much like SVG1.2 does with sXBL). > ... > <xbl:xbl xmlns:foo = "urn:foo" ...> > ... This is fine, as defined by [XMLNS]. > ... > <xbl:xbl xmlns:foo = "urn:foo" foo:bar = "baz" ...> > ... Whether this is conforming or not depends entirely on the specification defining the urn:foo namespace. > if there is such a section please make it more visible and clear, if > there is no such section, please define this in detail. I don't understand what there is to define here. It seems pretty obvious. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 23 October 2004 16:29:45 UTC