- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:51:55 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Cc: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, <www-svg@w3.org>
On Wednesday, November 24, 2004, 10:35:09 PM, Anne wrote: AvK> Chris Lilley wrote: >> On Wednesday, November 24, 2004, 9:49:39 PM, Anne wrote: >> >> AvK> Chris Lilley wrote: >> AvK> Because if no specific encoding is given, it should be treated >> as UTF-8 AvK> for application/xml. >> >> Again, I'm going to ask you to quote specific text in support of your >> argument. AvK> Here are some relevant snippets: AvK> # 8.20 INCONSISTENT EXAMPLE: Text/xml with UTF-8 Charset AvK> ... and: AvK> # 8.10 Application/xml with Omitted Charset and UTF-8 Entity Thanks for responding. I agree that UTF-8 is correct for those two examples. Now please read 8.9 Application/xml with Omitted Charset and UTF-16 XML MIME Entity and tell me why you believe this gets a UTF-8 charset when RFC 3023 clearly dsays that it gets UTF-16? -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Member, W3C Technical Architecture Group
Received on Wednesday, 24 November 2004 21:51:57 UTC