- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:05:47 -0000
- To: www-svg@w3.org
"Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU> wrote in message news:419B829C.7080608@mit.edu... > I'm sorry, but that doesn't seem to be true. Sorry, you are of course right, there were support issues in earlier times which I guess is why I wasn't even considering it an option, but a little research now I believe all the current CSS UA's do support it. I was only trying to explain why current authors don't use the CSS syntax rather than suggesting why these reasons might exist. > (and in some UAs may in fact be faster...). None that I've seen, but the difference is incredibily marginal of course (the extra overhead of resolving the .style. object presumably, which could be cached if speed was important) Jim.
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2004 18:05:52 UTC