- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 18:05:44 +0100
- To: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org, "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>
On Saturday, November 6, 2004, 7:27:00 PM, Jonathan wrote: JC> What was the intention* of the Working Group in providing JC> pseudo-class**? JC> The spec as it stands wouldn't seem to be setting a standard approach, JC> how would authors use it, if it were implemented***? JC> It is time there was an SVG Accessibility WG with a focus on Authoring JC> Tools. I was puzzled to work out how that followed on from the previous comment (and Jim's excellent response). Is it a new comment that merely reused the same subject line? JC> regards JC> Jonathan Chetwynd JC> http://www.peepo.co.uk "It's easy to use" JC> irc://freenode/accessibility JC> *HTML provides a standard use case with border, which isn't available JC> directly in SVG. JC> **It is in the spec, but is there a demonstration sample provided, for JC> instance in the test suite? JC> ***If a:visited has been implemented, could someone please post a JC> pointer to a resource, and name the implementation? JC> I tried <style type="text/css" id="css"><![CDATA[ a:visited { stroke: JC> blue }]]></style> in mozillaSVG, asv3.1 and batik without success JC> Jim suggested a:visited rect { stroke:blue } JC> On 6 Nov 2004, at 13:54, Jim Ley wrote: JC> "Jonathan Chetwynd" <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com> wrote in message JC> news:98BA63FC-2FDC-11D9-9145-000A95C7D298@btinternet.com... >> >> Can anyone on the SVGWG explain why the HTML standard a:visited was not >> adopted? JC> They're from CSS, and are required in SVG: JC> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/styling.html#StylingWithCSS JC> Jim. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Member, W3C Technical Architecture Group
Received on Monday, 8 November 2004 17:07:21 UTC