- From: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 18:27:00 +0000
- To: www-svg@w3.org
- Cc: "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>
What was the intention* of the Working Group in providing
pseudo-class**?
The spec as it stands wouldn't seem to be setting a standard approach,
how would authors use it, if it were implemented***?
It is time there was an SVG Accessibility WG with a focus on Authoring
Tools.
regards
Jonathan Chetwynd
http://www.peepo.co.uk "It's easy to use"
irc://freenode/accessibility
*HTML provides a standard use case with border, which isn't available
directly in SVG.
**It is in the spec, but is there a demonstration sample provided, for
instance in the test suite?
***If a:visited has been implemented, could someone please post a
pointer to a resource, and name the implementation?
I tried <style type="text/css" id="css"><![CDATA[ a:visited { stroke:
blue }]]></style> in mozillaSVG, asv3.1 and batik without success
Jim suggested a:visited rect { stroke:blue }
On 6 Nov 2004, at 13:54, Jim Ley wrote:
"Jonathan Chetwynd" <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:98BA63FC-2FDC-11D9-9145-000A95C7D298@btinternet.com...
>
> Can anyone on the SVGWG explain why the HTML standard a:visited was not
> adopted?
They're from CSS, and are required in SVG:
http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/styling.html#StylingWithCSS
Jim.
Received on Saturday, 6 November 2004 18:27:36 UTC