- From: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 18:27:00 +0000
- To: www-svg@w3.org
- Cc: "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>
What was the intention* of the Working Group in providing pseudo-class**? The spec as it stands wouldn't seem to be setting a standard approach, how would authors use it, if it were implemented***? It is time there was an SVG Accessibility WG with a focus on Authoring Tools. regards Jonathan Chetwynd http://www.peepo.co.uk "It's easy to use" irc://freenode/accessibility *HTML provides a standard use case with border, which isn't available directly in SVG. **It is in the spec, but is there a demonstration sample provided, for instance in the test suite? ***If a:visited has been implemented, could someone please post a pointer to a resource, and name the implementation? I tried <style type="text/css" id="css"><![CDATA[ a:visited { stroke: blue }]]></style> in mozillaSVG, asv3.1 and batik without success Jim suggested a:visited rect { stroke:blue } On 6 Nov 2004, at 13:54, Jim Ley wrote: "Jonathan Chetwynd" <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:98BA63FC-2FDC-11D9-9145-000A95C7D298@btinternet.com... > > Can anyone on the SVGWG explain why the HTML standard a:visited was not > adopted? They're from CSS, and are required in SVG: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/styling.html#StylingWithCSS Jim.
Received on Saturday, 6 November 2004 18:27:36 UTC