- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 17:10:47 -0000
- To: www-svg@w3.org
"Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch> wrote in message news:Pine.LNX.4.61.0411031617210.32576@dhalsim.dreamhost.com... > On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Robin Berjon wrote: >> Ever seen poetry laid out inside a shape? Ever seen ad text following >> the shiny curves of the latest spacecraft? Ever seen some sombre lament >> about the passing of time animated as it falls through an hourglass? >> *That* is what it's for. It's for text when used as graphics. > > All three of those examples are great examplies of documents that need > semantic markup. So what particular semantic markup would be used in each of those cases? and why are you not calling out for a huge amount more semantic markup than the woefully small amount we get in XHTML 1.0 or even XHTML 2.0 - the first surely needs an advert element, to show it's an advert for a spacecraft - or perhaps Description if it's just describing it. The lament is maybe a poem, maybe just a sentence, it's only debateably a paragraph, and certainly not anything more semantically available - in reality it's just a snippet of text. the content of CSS is semantically empty, it appears in no mark-up whatsoever, but this isn't necessarily a bad thing, the semantics of text in rendering, comes from the rendering, it is not (necessarily) inherent in the text. > or to have them indexed using Semantic Web inference rules. which would be much easier done with some additional markup that can exactly specify their intent rather than just assuming it's a P. > then multiline text in SVG should be done by applying SVG to > documents in other markup languages, not by adding more text markup to > SVG, What other markup languages provide multiline text? HTML certainly doesn't, and CSS styling is not possible in SVG Tiny. Jim.
Received on Wednesday, 3 November 2004 17:11:16 UTC