- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 16:26:47 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Jon Ferraiolo <jon.ferraiolo@adobe.com>
- Cc: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, www-svg@w3.org
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Jon Ferraiolo wrote: > > In my opinion, all of this talk about how SVG 1.2 flowing text infringes > on XHTML or infringes on CSS represents barking up the wrong tree. What > it really "infringes" on, if anything, is XSL-FO's <fo:block> and > <fo:inline>. You'll notice that I've been saying the same thing about XSL:FO as I have been saying about SVG's proposed multiline text feature. It violates AWWW and WCAG, has poor accessibility, and semantic markup styled with CSS is a much better model which should have been used instead. It's also worth noting that XSL:FO is not supported by any Web browser. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 3 November 2004 16:26:49 UTC