- From: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 14:38:13 +0100
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org, Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 6 May 2004 09:38:16 UTC
This rather crucially depends on one's interpretation of 'usefully' I generally mean something that can be tested with users. others may mean useful, as in designing for the future. both have there purpose, but it is important that clarity is maintained. This distinction isn't always clear to me within SVG documentation, however practical working examples are frequently available. We need to maintain, update and upgrade these examples as much as develop future versions. In particular, accessibility seems to be falling behind, at least so far as AT is concerned 2 recent examples: ASV3 only allows switch systemLanguage <text> not <title> http://www.schepers.cc/testbed/switch.svg tinyline didn't support the use of a background behind a link, there wasn't a test that included this. best wishes Jonathan Chetwynd http://www.peepo.co.uk "It's easy to use"
Received on Thursday, 6 May 2004 09:38:16 UTC