- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:10:26 +0000 (UTC)
- To: www-svg@w3.org
From changelog at http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-SVG12-20040226/ |Profiling: new section describing outlines for profiling SVG. This is |the replacement for the Image and Application section in the previous |draft. The profiling section is solving completely different problems to the Image/Application section, and is really only solving its issues from an authoring, not accessing perspective. There is still nothing in SVG 1.2 that allows us to use different viewers with their differing capabilities, SVG 1.2 seems to be focusing on a single viewer that can do everything. I feel it's important that we have a mechanism to differentiate between viewers without first parsing the document. I don't believe there are any current systems for doing this, and whilst image/ application/ split is not a perfect solution, it's at least a simple to implement solution that will work today, and has proven implementations. I welcome profiling, but would still like to see an application/svg+xml - I don't make SVG images, I make SVG applications, and I'd like to ensure they end up with a viewer capable of rendering them. Alternatively I'd like to see RCC etc. reformulated so it will simply degrade to valid static content showing the same information in SVG 1.1 user agents - at the moment that degrade path is onerous. Cheers, Jim.
Received on Tuesday, 2 March 2004 06:10:30 UTC