Re: Few SVGT1.2 comments

On Thu 01 Jul 2004, Dean Jackson wrote:

> > GCW>  I don't see any reason why
> > GCW> it should not be in Tiny. In some circonstances and when correctly used,
> > GCW> it can greatly improve the responsiveness of an SVG file.
> > 
> > I tend to agree.
> pointer-events? I assume you mean onclick etc?

Forget everything I said after this. I was drunk :)

It hadn't occured to me that you meant the property rather
than the events (Antoine kindly told me I was a dumbass).

Yes pointer-events should be in SVGT 1.2.

We're also splitting selection-events, so that you can 
mark something as selectable without getting clicks.


Received on Thursday, 1 July 2004 05:35:27 UTC