- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:02:12 +0100
- To: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
* Elliotte Harold wrote: >> If you ignore for a second that the proposed image/svg+xml registration >> does not refer to http://w3.org/TR/SVG11/linking#FragmentIdentifiersSVG >> this should be well-defined already since sXBL can only be used when >> included in SVG 1.2 documents. Things might be less well-defined if the >> referenced document is not a conforming image/svg+xml SVG 1.2 document, >> though. > >The import element is normally intended to point at sXBL documents (if >I'm reading the spec right; I might not be). has a MIME media type been >chosen for sXBL documents yet? In particular, is it likely to be >image/svg+xml or something else? Again, I don't think any of the sXBL drafts introduced the notion of an sXBL document, you always have an SVG host document. The SVG 1.2 Working Draft proposes http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG12/mimereg.html image/svg+xml for SVG documents. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Thursday, 23 December 2004 07:02:24 UTC