- From: Cameron McCormack <cam-www-svg@aka.mcc.id.au>
- Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 11:49:18 +1000
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Hey everyone. I have a couple of questions about the SVG 1.2 draft. (Wasn't a new one forthcoming?) 1. What would happen if I used traitDef to define a CSS trait that took an SVG type that wasn't already supported in CSS? For example: <traitDef name="matrix" type="CSS" valueType="SVGMatrix"/> (Shouldn't these attributes be attributeName and attributeType for consistency with the SMIL elements?) 2. I notice that in ASV6 document.getElementById will find elements which are in shadow trees but really the shadow tree isn't part of the document tree so this is not correct, right? That would mean that any time authors want to look up elements in shadow trees by id they would need to explictly include an svg element in their shadow tree so they can call SVGSVGElement.getElementById. This seems a bit awkward and unnecessary. Perhaps SVGShadowElement could include a getElementById as well? Or derive from SVGSVGElement? Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack | Web: http://mcc.id.au/ | ICQ: 26955922
Received on Sunday, 29 August 2004 01:49:26 UTC