- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:06:45 +0200
- To: Jacob Lister <jacob@keystoneframework.org>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 2:20:06 PM, Jacob wrote: JL> On Friday, July 23, 2004, 10:29:26 AM, Jacob wrote: JL>> On Thursday, July 22, 2004, 12:11:24 PM, Jacob wrote: JL>>> * How would I go about making a submission? >>>I will send you an xml file to fill in. I would also need to see the >>>tests running in the implementation to verify that the tests are passed >>>correctly. >>Excellent, I look forward to that. The format is no big secret, here it >>is (three xml attachments) JL> I'm working through the test suite and filling in the XML results file now. JL> I have a few questions about the format - JL> The results file has more entries than the test suite, are these duds? No, they are tests that have not been released yet as they are being QA checked. Just leave them blank. JL> I'm working from JL> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/20030813/status/matrix.html JL> (SVG Tiny Profile Results) for the tests to report on, is this the best subset of JL> tests to be using for the SVG tiny profile? All of three tiny tests have -t in the filename. If you look at the html test harness, there are options to go through all the tiny tests, or the basic ones (tiny +basic) or the full thing (tiny + basic + full). JL> Initial revision numbers are a bit out of step with the test suite JL> files, no real correlation here? A few examples in the results file JL> have revision numbers ahead of the test suite files. I'll fill out JL> revision numbers as listed in the test suite files The unreleased suite has some revisions, although often to the documentation rather than the actual test itself. Please adjust the revision numbers to those of the actual tests you used. JL> Thanks for your interest in the project, will be in touch soon with JL> a small application to run the test suite Excellent, thanks. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Member, W3C Technical Architecture Group
Received on Tuesday, 3 August 2004 12:06:45 UTC