- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 16:14:20 +0100
- To: www-svg@w3.org, Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
On Thursday, March 13, 2003, 3:50:03 PM, Tobias wrote: TR> I listed both TR> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/DTD/svg10.dtd TR> and TR> http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd TR> and both seem to have been changed. No, just the undated one. TR> But TR> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/DTD/svg-20010904.dtd TR> has not been changed. (Perhaps that's what you meant.) Correct. TR> The other section you are referring to answers all my questions: TR> 'The 'includes errata' DTD on the W3C site has also been updated to TR> include the above fragment: TR> "http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/DTD/svg10.dtd" TR> In consequence, content which is transitioned from the earlier Working TR> Drafts and Candidate Recommendation DTDs will continue to validate TR> correctly. Local copies of the svg10.dtd should be updated to reflect TR> this change. TR> In addition, for historical record, a copy of the DTD incorporating TR> this errata has been placed at the dated location: TR> "http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/DTD/svg-20021115.dtd"' So, if there is a date at the end of the DTD filename it is frozen. If there is no date, then it can change to accommodate errata. TR> It seems as if TR> 1. the DTD(s) found at these URLs have not been changed TR> (or are the same as the original DTD): TR> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/DTD/svg-20010904.dtd TR> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/DTD/svg-20021115.dtd TR> http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg-20010904.dtd Correct TR> ... and TR> 2. those have been changed/fixed: TR> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/DTD/svg10.dtd TR> http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd Yes. -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 13 March 2003 10:14:45 UTC