Re: has the SVG 1.0 DTD been edited? (xmlns:xlink on element svg)

On Thursday, March 13, 2003, 3:50:03 PM, Tobias wrote:


TR> I listed both
TR>   http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/DTD/svg10.dtd
TR> and
TR>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd
TR> and both seem to have been changed.

No, just the undated one.

TR> But
TR>   http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/DTD/svg-20010904.dtd
TR> has not been changed. (Perhaps that's what you meant.)

Correct.

TR> The other section you are referring to answers all my questions:

TR>    'The 'includes errata' DTD on the W3C site has also been updated to
TR>    include the above fragment:
TR>    "http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/DTD/svg10.dtd"

TR>    In consequence, content which is transitioned from the earlier Working
TR>    Drafts and Candidate Recommendation DTDs will continue to validate
TR>    correctly. Local copies of the svg10.dtd should be updated to reflect
TR>    this change.

TR>    In addition, for historical record, a copy of the DTD incorporating
TR>    this errata has been placed at the dated location:

TR>    "http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/DTD/svg-20021115.dtd"'

So, if there is a date at the end of the DTD filename it is frozen. If
there is no date, then it can change to accommodate errata.

TR> It seems as if

TR> 1. the DTD(s) found at these URLs have not been changed
TR> (or are the same as the original DTD):
TR> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/DTD/svg-20010904.dtd
TR> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/DTD/svg-20021115.dtd
TR> http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg-20010904.dtd

Correct

TR> ... and
TR> 2. those have been changed/fixed:
TR> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/DTD/svg10.dtd
TR> http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd

Yes.


-- 
 Chris                            mailto:chris@w3.org

Received on Thursday, 13 March 2003 10:14:45 UTC