- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 01:53:39 +0100
- To: www-svg@w3.org, Allen Razdow <arazdow@mathsoft.com>
- CC: "'steve@fenestra.com'" <steve@fenestra.com>
On Thursday, January 30, 2003, 6:55:40 PM, Allen wrote: AR> Steve, AR> I don't know, but am interested in the answer myself! I'm responding to let AR> you know that messages regarding SVG support for allowing graphics to adapt AR> to sizes of particular strings do show up now and then (some from me). This AR> topic appears not to be one that the powers-that-be found important for some AR> reason. Scripting is said to have access to sizes of things, and that AR> scripts are thus necessary to properly adapt graphics to text. AR> -Allen AR> -----Original Message----- AR> From: Steve Schafer [mailto:steve@fenestra.com] AR> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:12 AM AR> To: www-svg@w3.org AR> Subject: X-height fallback AR> Not all fonts specify an x-height, and even when they do, it's not AR> always possible to determine what it is (Windows, for example, doesn't AR> provide an API for obtaining a font's x-height). AR> Does SVG define any kind of fallback mechanism for approximating a AR> font's x-height (for dimensions specified in "ex" units)? I couldn't AR> find anything in the spec. CSS does, and SVG follows that. 1ex can be approximated as 0.5em for those fonts that have no lower case letters or for platforms that do not allow access to the x-height in a font. -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 30 January 2003 19:53:41 UTC