- From: Cameron McCormack <clm@csse.monash.edu.au>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 17:34:01 +1000
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Hi Fred. Fred P.: > Tell me now where is the problem > with your grid, painting layers > or 3D grid thing? I think the problem with this method is that you are required to mention the objects in the grid or table in a row-major, column-minor order, which would force you to have this rendering order. If you wanted, say, a 3x3 arrangement of objects, layed out automatically with this grid-mechanism, but you wanted another object to appear over the centre object, but behind the outer objects, you wouldn't be able to. Similar situations where this happens already exist -- for example if you have a <g/> which you'll <use/> later on, and you want an object to appear somewhere in the middle of it (on the Z axis). In this case though you could decompose the used <g/> and do it manually with the new object inserted in the middle. But with the grid layout that won't work; you can't decompose the grid because the grid needs to be all together for it to determine the appropriate {x,y,width,height}s for the grid elements. Cameron PS: I'm new to the list. Hi everyone! -- Cameron McCormack // clm@csse.monash.edu.au // http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~clm/ // icq 26955922
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2003 03:36:33 UTC