Re: 1.2 feedback: printing from Jim Ley on 2002-11-19 (www-svg@w3.org from November 2002)

From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:04:05 -0000
To: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <ardcte$qqp$1@main.gmane.org>

"Tobias Reif" <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com> wrote in message
news:3DDA330D.7030907@pinkjuice.com...

> But wouldn't it be helpful to be able to validate static SVGs against a
> static profile, and then be able to say "nothing moves in this SVG, and
> nothing is interactive; a rasterized version will show the same as the
> SVG (obviously much less accessible etc, but visually equivalent)".

It would be great to have this, and also say so at the HTTP level,
preferable in the mime-type, but in another header if appropriate, you
may have 2 SVG renderers, one which is really good, but doesn't support
animation, and another which is not so good but does, it would be great
to choose between them, before needing to look inside the document.

Jim.

Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2002 08:12:00 UTC