- From: Niklas Gustavsson <niklas@protocol7.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:39:48 +0100
- To: www-svg@w3.org
> >> My feeling today is that SVGP should be as close to "Static SVG > >> Basic" as possible. > > NG> Yes! I want this badly. One of the common uses I have in my > NG> day-time job is to produce static images (.gif, .png) > NG> automatically. [...] rasterizing SVG is a much more attractive way > NG> of doing this. [...] A static profile would be much > NG> needed. > > There already is a set of conformance criteria for static viewers. > Which clearly explains how a static viewer should handle all SVG > content. What more do you want from a static 'profile'? Nothing. Sorry for totally missing this. I thought about it a few seconds after sending my email :-) /niklas
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2002 07:39:51 UTC