Re: Tinier SVG

On Thursday, November 14, 2002, 2:48:40 PM, Simon wrote:


SSL> chris@w3.org (Chris Lilley) writes:
>>Its an example. Simon, you are experienced enough and smart enough to
>>be able to distinguish between a spec and an implementation without
>>being prompted.

SSL> Fair enough.  It sounds like I'll need to develop my own spec to develop
SSL> an implementation, but that's hardly impossible in this constrained a
SSL> programming world.

No, my point was simpler. Citing that one implementation was 97k does
not mean 'SVG Tiny is always 97k' or 'SVGT never fits into 64k' etc.

>>Aac> Do you have information/estimates about what proportion of
>>Aac> devices ... in use or currently for sale ... are limited to 64K?
>>
>>I would be interested to hear that, as well.

SSL> I've not yet seen any of the J2ME Personal Profile devices, but they may
SSL> be coming soon.  There are a fairly wide variety of devices which run
SSL> J2ME PP's predecessor, PersonalJava (a cut-down 1.1), but that's been
SSL> deprecated for a long time now.  There are also some interesting
SSL> examples (I believe the Zaurus

Yes; TinyLine runs on Zaurus (but in J2ME not SE).


-- 
 Chris                            mailto:chris@w3.org

Received on Thursday, 14 November 2002 09:31:07 UTC