- From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:51:30 +0100
- To: www-svg@w3.org
- CC: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Hi Chris, > One thing that was not mentioned though it was :) > is that schema languages such > as RelaxNG and W3C XML Schema allow this situation to be resolved > because they can express content models like > "when an a element is a child of a text element, its content model > includes tspan" In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2002Aug/0039.html I wrote: ''Inside the limitations of DTD, this is a reasonable design decision, IMHO. In a different schema lang, one should be able to say "an a can have tspan children, but only if it has a text ancestor" Seems to be quite simple to express via XPath. Perhaps Schematron, Relax NG, or W3C XML Schema?'' > So, should be better in SVG 1.2 Sounds great! Will there be a normative Relax NG schema for 1.2? Or a normative XSD? And will there still be a normative DTD? Today is like christmas; it's really great that you address so many issues raised on this list :) Tobi -- http://www.pinkjuice.com/
Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2002 06:52:04 UTC