- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 11:50:57 +0100
- To: www-svg@w3.org, "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>
Hello Jim, www-svg, You wrote http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2002Aug/0008.html > My concern is with the default value, text/ecmascript is not a > registered mime-type, and a draft from Bjoern Hoehrmann > http://www.websitedev.de/ietf/draft-hoehrmann-script-types-00.txt > met with some resistance and has expired indicating that > text/ecmascript is unlikely to ever be a registered mime-type. A new (-01) draft is in development. Further, the ECMA 262 committee want ECMAscript registered as text/ecmascript. We will wait to see what happens, but will not change our spec in the meantime. Its likely that both text/ecmascript and application/ecmascript will be registered. Its certainly better to point to a vendor-neutral and standardised language like ECMAscript than it is to point to a less well defined and vendor-specific language such as JScript or JavaScript. -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2002 05:50:56 UTC