- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 19:56:03 +0200
- To: www-svg@w3.org, Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
On Thursday, May 30, 2002, 6:51:51 PM, Tobias wrote: TR> Chris Lilley wrote: >> Not immediately apparent from that posting (though visible in the >> examples), the hues can be combined. TR> Ah OK. >> Will see if i >> have a copy of that paper around somewhere, in a file cabinet at >> INRIA most likely if it has not been thrown out. TR> Perhaps you could get an electronic copy from the publisher, perhaps TR> with permission to post it online? Perhaps, if there seems to be interest in adding a new set of color keywords. >> It remains to be shown, though, that any color naming syntax has any >> benefit over entity references which can be used to assign any desired >> color to any desired keyword, under user control, in any language, >> with 100% interoperability and no changes to the specification. TR> You mean the designer would map his own keywords to RGB values via XML entities? Yes. TR> If that's what you mean, I really don't like it. TR> I want to have the flexibility of RGB (which is there right now), plus TR> the convenience and expressiveness of nice human language descriptions TR> (sentences or keywords); the latter mechanism should be convenient, and TR> not require me to declare entities first. Why is that inconvenient? Its the standard XML mechanism for doing such a thing. TR> Tobi -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2002 13:56:53 UTC