- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 22:37:20 +0200
- To: www-svg@w3.org, Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- CC: fantasai <fantasai@escape.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Tuesday, May 28, 2002, 1:57:16 AM, Tantek wrote: TÇ> On 5/27/02 3:26 PM, "fantasai" <fantasai@escape.com> wrote: >> If you think X11 name support is important for the future, then I >> recommend you take Kynn's suggestion and separate it out of raw color >> values with functional notation. This leaves the syntax open to better >> naming schemes CSS may want to adopt in the future. TÇ> Either the X11 colors should be advocated as is, or they should be TÇ> deprecated as is. I don't think it makes any sense to go with introducing a TÇ> new syntax for something you want deprecated. Thanks for the sanity there, Tantek. Of course, redesigning the past is fine if the only object is a stimulating discussion. In terms of actual implementations though, adding a new syntax for an instantly deprecated feature that is already consistently implemented for the last six years is - well, solipsism. -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2002 16:38:00 UTC