- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 18:50:57 +0200
- To: www-svg@w3.org, Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, 5:44:11 PM, Tobias wrote: TR> Braden McDaniel wrote: >> Furthermore, the type simply is wrong-headed. "application/ecmascript" >> is appropriate. TR> ... "because"? TR> From my POV, having limited knowledge of the implications related to TR> MIME Type naming, I think that application/ecmascript is better than TR> text/ecmascript, because the main characteristic of a portion of ECMA TR> Script code is being an application; a program. It is also text, but I TR> don't view this as it's main property. Suggest that you read the definition of 'application' in that case. it doesn't really fit, either. The paucity of top-level types is a known problem with MIME. -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2002 12:53:15 UTC