- From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 17:44:11 +0200
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Braden McDaniel wrote: > Furthermore, the type simply is wrong-headed. "application/ecmascript" > is appropriate. ... "because"? From my POV, having limited knowledge of the implications related to MIME Type naming, I think that application/ecmascript is better than text/ecmascript, because the main characteristic of a portion of ECMA Script code is being an application; a program. It is also text, but I don't view this as it's main property. Tobi -- http://www.pinkjuice.com/
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2002 11:43:10 UTC