- From: Thomas E Deweese <thomas.deweese@kodak.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 12:55:33 -0400
- To: Jonathan Watt <jonathan@jwatt.net>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
>>>>> "JW" == Jonathan Watt <jonathan@jwatt.net> writes: JW> The example in section 15.10 demonstrates a filter that is JW> supposed to do a conversion to grayscale, however the matrix given JW> is incorrect. For feColorMatrix the value A' is obtained from: Where do you read that it is supposed to do a conversion to grayscale? It is an _EXAMPLE_ of using the matrix form of feMatrix. JW> I would suggest that for a grayscale filter the alpha values of JW> each pixel should be left as it is (and certainly should not rely JW> on the R, G and B values of the pixel). Therefore the values a30, JW> a31 and a32 should be '0' and a33 should be '1'. The feColorMatrix JW> would then change [...] to: JW> <feColorMatrix type="matrix" in="SourceGraphic" JW> values=".33 .33 .33 0 0 JW> .33 .33 .33 0 0 JW> .33 .33 .33 0 0 JW> 0 0 0 1 0"/> Well if you really want to convert an RGB image to gray scale you should use a matrix that looks like: <feColorMatrix type="matrix" in="SourceGraphic" values=".213 .715 .072 0 0 .213 .715 .072 0 0 .213 .715 .072 0 0 0 0 0 1 0"/> To account for the visual weighting of the RGB components that occurs in the eye (very sensitive to green very insensitive to blue). The above matrix happens to be exactly what you get with: <feColorMatrix type="saturate" values="0" in="SourceGraphic"/> Given that the issue is with an example, and the example does not purport to do a grayscale conversion I think we are OK here. What do you think?
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2002 12:55:36 UTC