- From: Arnold, Curt <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 10:55:00 -0600
- To: "'svg-developers@yahoogroups.com'" <svg-developers@yahoogroups.com>
- Cc: "'anderst@toolsmiths.se'" <anderst@toolsmiths.se>, "'sandro@w3.org'" <sandro@w3.org>, "'www-svg@w3.org'" <www-svg@w3.org>
This regards a current thread on svg-developers@groups.yahoo.com (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/message/7512 and 50 or so messages following) and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2001Oct/0045.html and following. This thread has apparently crossed over the svg-developers, I had replied on www-dom@w3.org (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2001Oct/0049.html) that the issue of microparsing had been brought up in other contexts (A google search on microparsing brought up about 3 pages on topic posts), a good summary is http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2001/04/25/deviant.html and http://www.w3.org/2001/06/blindfold/grammar) If we want to pursue this, then the appropriate thing to do would be to collaborate with other potential microparsers users and come up with solutions that address all our needs. It would be useful if some of the people involved in the earlier Microparsing debates could update the SVG community on the state on any work and any appropriate forum for continuing the discussion.
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2001 12:59:12 UTC