- From: Robert DiBlasi <r_diblasi@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 15:06:18 +0000
- To: chris@w3.org
- Cc: jferraio@adobe.com, w3t-svg@w3.org, www-svg@w3.org
Chris, >Robert DiBlasi wrote: > > > > Jon and working group and SVG Working Team and community, > > > > I would like to request a that the 4.2 Recognized color keyword names > > section have a color chip next to the color names. > > > > The format could be something llike: > > ½ cm sq color chip keyword keyword value > > > > I think it would make the specification more useful.... > <chris_wrote> >Yes, that could easily be done. Of course, it depends on HTML displaying >the color correctly. </chris_wrote> That would be great if if color chips could be put next to keyword values...."it depends on HTML displaying"....I understanding that to mean that some user agent might not be able to render the color....therefore a color chip that is not understood by user agent would be empty or....not there?...If you state that some user agents may not support the colors .....this would help people understand the results they see on the screen...just a thought > > might be a good Idea to separate the CSS2 colors from > > the CSS3 color also....... > <chris_wrote> >Not sure why this would be a good idea? It might be, i just don't see >why.... </chris_wrote> Thinking is.....some user agents might not display the CSS2 or CSS3 colors....so by placing the new CSS3 colors in their own section ...one could tell if the user agent supports new colors.....it was just an idea...not sure if it really is even an issue .... using the specification as a testing ground for colors .....may not be the right place...:-) We all learn by sharing what we know Robert A. DiBlasi _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
Received on Saturday, 28 July 2001 11:06:50 UTC