- From: Dave J Woolley <david.woolley@bts.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:35:01 -0000
- To: www-svg@w3.org
> From: TOa2671644@aol.com [SMTP:TOa2671644@aol.com] > > Has anyone thoughts about the relative merits of the rival technologies: > SVG, > SMIL, Flash5? I am interested in expressed views. > [DJW:] I believe SMIL and SVG are supposed to complement each other and be used in the same document, so they are not rivals. Part of SVG's origins (I would argue the original reason for it) are to do with the production of static technical drawings, so its aims are, in part, at a tangent to those of flash. I realise that most market interest is as a flash competitor. -- --------------------------- DISCLAIMER --------------------------------- Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of BTS. >
Received on Tuesday, 27 February 2001 06:35:10 UTC