- From: Ian Tindale <ian_tindale@yahoo.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 00:04:42 -0000
- To: <www-svg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <002301c188e9$ed8c0aa0$f400a8c0@solstice2>
On the one hand I look forward to the death of the browser, although that'll never happen. On the other hand, media is more or less at the mercy of the browser manufacturers and whatever / however they support media. This is even more prominent a vulnerability given the recent discussion over Mozilla's moving goalpost act. One solution is that exhibited by Real in creating what is effectively mostly a full browser for the media types they promote. Quicktime player reminds me of this. However, this is another vulnerability - look at what happened with QuickTime. I used to be 100% preoccupied with creating QTVR panoramic movies at one stage. Unfortunately now I can't rely on any user having the capability to play a QVTR .MOV without certain media players attempting to open it and finding it's not what it assumed it was. Again, and I keep banging on about this, but we're at the mercy of computer legacy and computer habitual usages, in that we're not greatly more advanced than we were when the version 4 browsers emerged, by which time Flash had taken a bit of a hold as the way of universalising media content without having to tolerate the platform differences. I consider (and it's back to me dreaming again) that our critical 'killer-app' is not within the computer realm, for us SVG-ers. Yes, it's perhaps in wireless devices, but it's also on TV. For starters, imagine a digital teletext that could be implemented over ordinary PC-like hardware, but essentially consists of FO, SVG and SMIL. The state of the art in digital and interactive television is in by no means a fixed state. What's the procedure, I wonder, in demonstrating to television people that set top boxes (for example, based on the new VIA Eden embedded board) can be developed upon easily by people who are essentially 'only' web developers but experienced by ordinary people on their ordinary sofas while their ordinary VCRs blink 12:00. This teletext layer could act as anything from the entire user interface to the television service, to a web content browser, to a means of presenting interactive (and non-) television programming. The difference between what is a television program and what is teletext would blur, and the document aspect could be more 'magazine-ized' than is presently allowable. Perhaps. This is a medium crying out for an intelligent graphic implementation such as SVG. Perhaps the big red herring is the thought process that says we have to experience our media on the same kind of box that we create it with. Break this barrier and a new frontier opens. (Yeah, like, as if.) VIA Eden - http://www.via.com.tw/en/Products/eden.jsp Cheers. Ian Tindale.
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2001 19:04:58 UTC