- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 04:26:05 -0500 (EST)
- To: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>
- cc: <www-svg@w3.org>
Yes, I agree. Or a browser that understands SVG really natively, like Amaya is working towards, and Mozilla might. cheers Charles On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 AndrewWatt2001@aol.com wrote: In a message dated 19/12/01 07:56:38 GMT Standard Time, charles@w3.org writes: > That's true. > I think SVG-Core is what we need in order to make SVG mainstream. > It's really stupid to use 10MB "plugin" just to draw rectangle or circle > on > the web page. All browsers (absolute minimum: MS IE and Netscape) should > support such primitives, and complete SVG specification is obviously too > *fat* for this. Charles, I guess it is much less stupid to use a 2.303MB plugin which is the actual size of the Adobe SVG Viewer version 3.0 download. Andrew Watt -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2001 04:26:09 UTC