- From: Josh Zeidner <jmz_phylogenic@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 10:30:09 EDT
- To: BCava@maptech.com, www-svg@w3.org
Hi, A decendant? Maybe a relative would be a better term. They are definately similar- but not necessary compatible. As for the future of VML, I would definately go with SVG: most of the features of VML will be supported in SVG and SVG has more market inertia. -Josh Zeidner >Thank you kindly for your response! > >So would you say that is SVG a descendent of VML? Is there any >documentation >on w3.org that compares the two? I've been developing a few apps that >generate dynamic images using VML and need to know if I should continue in >this direction, or drop it and go to SVG? I guess I'm looking for a little >bit more technical explanation on the differences? > >Again, I thank you for your response. >Bill > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Josh Zeidner [mailto:jmz_phylogenic@hotmail.com] >Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 9:56 AM >To: BCava@maptech.com; www-svg@w3.org >Subject: Re: svg > > > >howdy Bill, > > Simple: the requirements for VML changed so drastically, the work done >already was incompatible, so a new acronym was forged : SVG. Then >everybody > >lived happily ever after. > >-Josh Zeidner > > > > >Greetings, > > > >I scoured the SVG Overview at the following URL, > >http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Overview.htm8 > >and still couldn't find an answer to my question. So, I pass my query to > >you. > > > >What's the difference between SVG and VML? > >http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-VML > > > >Many thanks in advance, > >Bill > >bcava@maptech.com > > > >________________________________________________________________________ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
Received on Friday, 23 June 2000 10:30:45 UTC