- From: Pankaj Kamthan <kamthan@cs.concordia.ca>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 17:27:37 -0400
- To: lwfry@bbnow.net
- CC: www-svg@w3.org
Lawrence, "What can you say to dissuade me?" The following: "When is svg expected to be a w3c recommendation? This standard has been moving at a snails pace recently, and the release of two successive "last call" specs is disheartening for those of us relying on the new standard." Why is it "disheartening"? "Exchange SVG" in the March draft was a welcome addition as it, among other things, gave a more data centric view of SVG, in line with the XML philosophy. Whether that really required splitting the language into two DTDs (and a main DTD that calls the appropriate one, depending on the application) and two different namespaces was questionable. In this sense, the June draft has been "simplified". SVG is currently in a "Working Draft" status. Working Drafts are not "standards". (More specifically, W3C does not produce standards, it provides Recommendations that are considered stable for public use.) So it is unclear why would somebody "rely" on the "standard". Those who are interested, follow and contribute to the development in an iterative process. "Because the standard has "missed" the development window for new versions of ie and netscape, the wide use of svg will be postponed by at least 2 years." Mozilla SVG Project has been following the SVG development. What is the basis of the argument that "the wide use of svg will be postponed by at least 2 years?" There is no direct relationship between a technology having been stabilized (say in a Recommendation/Standard) and that it will have a conforming implementation. HTML (4.0, 4.01) and CSS (1, 2) contortions in user agents over the last few years are well-known examples. Therefore, "stabilization" of SVG has little to do whether it will or should be supported in user agents-of-the-day. "I believe that major players such as Microsoft and Adobe orchestrated this delay so that they could squeeze more profit out of their non-svg graphics software, and the w3c has been duped into this gambit." A belief is not a proof. Adobe has been working on providing both SVG authoring (Illustrator 9) and rendering (SVG plug-in) support for some time. Pankaj
Received on Monday, 17 July 2000 17:29:24 UTC