- From: Blaine Brodie <bbrodie@savagesoftware.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 09:54:12 -0700
- To: jferraio@Adobe.COM
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
The problem is that the first syntax has a comma in its repetition while the second does not. According to the first syntax the following example is valid, but it is invalid according to the second syntax: icc-color(example, 1, 3, 5) It seems that the second syntax must be incorrect since it does not contain a separator in its repetition. Blaine jferraio@Adobe.COM writes: >Blaine, >It seems to me the two are equivalent. The "*" means zero-or-more, and the >"+" means one-or-more. > >The spec should use the same BNF in all places, however. I'll research >this >and make sure the same BNF appears in all places (or only appears in one >place, with references in the other places.) > >Jon Ferraiolo >SVG Editor >Adobe Systems Incorporated > > >At 02:41 PM 7/10/00 -0700, Blaine Brodie wrote: >>What is the correct syntax for specifing a icc-color function? The >>specification currently has it as both >>"icc-color(<name>,<icccolorvalue>[,<icccolorvalue>]*)" >>and "icc-color(<name>,<icccolorvalue>+)". >
Received on Tuesday, 11 July 2000 12:54:41 UTC