[csswg] Agenda for conf call on Oct 19, 2022

Time/Phone/WebEx details available to WG Members in w3c-css-wg.
See https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2017OctDec/0076.html


US Toll Number: +1-617-324-0000
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20221012T16


0. Extra agenda items and other digressions

1. [css-values-3] Restrict none/auto/normal from <custom-ident>
Proposed Resolution: Do NOT exclude none/auto/normal from <custom-ident>
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7431#issuecomment-1178237576


2. [mediaqueries] Merge error handling section into evaluating section
WG Action: Decide what to test for
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7595


3. [css-contain-2] Should content-visibility apply to elements when size containment has no effect?
Proposed Resolution: change content-visibility to only apply to elements for which size containment can apply.
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7658


4. [css-overflow][css-contain][css-sizing] overflow: auto incompatible with size containment and container queries
Proposed Resolution: size containment forces overflow:auto to behave as overflow:scroll
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7875


5. [css-nesting-1] Syntax Invites Errors
WG Action: Update spec to use option 3, continue evaluating option 4?
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7834#issuecomment-1282776786


6. [meta] Co-authoring CSS Design Principles with the TAG
WG Action: decide on structure
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7835


7. [css-tables] Allow 'order' on table columns WG Question: Do we want to do this (and therefore task fremy with adding it to the spec)?
Proposed Resolution: ??? (is this ready to discuss again?)
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7340#issuecomment-1247390415


8. [css-grid-2] How to properly accommodate margin/border/padding of a subgrid with no item on the edges
Proposed Resolution: Simplify to single-span hypothetical items only Alternative Resolution: Spec applying "magic margin" to outermost items, not just items in outermost tracks
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7465#issuecomment-1265913276


9. [css-align] *-items properties might need to resolve directions early
WG Action: Review and confirm whether summary reflects desired behavior
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7612#issuecomment-1230963091


10. [css-align] align-self / justify-self on abspos elements isn't back compatible?
WG Action: Consider whether we want to use staticpos containing block instead of abspos containing block to resolve alignment properties on statically positioned abspos
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7599


11. [css-flexbox] Investigate applying align-content to single-line flex containers
Proposed Resolution: Closed no change, add to list of mistakes, see
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3052#issuecomment-1226112918


12. [css-align-3][css-multicol-1] First baseline of a multicol
WG Action: Consider and choose one of the options
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7856


Thanks,

Alan