- From: Rossen Atanassov <Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 03:42:35 +0000
- To: W3C style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
Time/Phone/WebEx details available to WG Members in w3c-css-wg.
See https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2017OctDec/0076.html
US Toll Number: +1-617-324-0000
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20221012T16
0. Extra agenda items and other digressions
Text Layout and i18n
--------------------
1. [css-text-4] text-spacing: trim-end is better than allow-end for the normal value
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7055
Proposed Resolution: Accept commenter proposal
2. [selectors] :lang for documents without content language and for elements of unknown language; consider :lang("") over :not(:lang("*"))
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6915#issuecomment-1247024928
Proposed Resolution: Accept proposal (above)
3. [css-ruby-1] Default alignment of ruby text
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/771#issuecomment-1182339573
[css-ruby-1] Treatment of multiple Latin words in space-between & space-around
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/771#issuecomment-1245793436
Proposed Resolution: Add new text-justify mode, either tied to 'text-justify:
auto' + 'display: ruby-text' or as a new keyword, with appropriate justification opportunities for ruby text.
Syntax and Selectors
--------------------
4. [css-values-3] Restrict none/auto/normal from <custom-ident>
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7431#issuecomment-1178237576
Proposed Resolution: Exclude none/auto/normal from <custom-ident>
5. [selectors][css-nesting] Move nest-containing and nest-prefixed selector definitions to Selectors
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7431#issuecomment-1178237576
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5745#issuecomment-1271874448
Proposed Resolution: & is valid in all Selectors, and where not otherwise specified has equivalent meaning to :scope
6. [selectors] Add :open or :top-layer pseudo class
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7319#issuecomment-1242377579
Proposed Resolution: Adopt Tab's proposed definition
CSS Grid Layout
---------------
7. [css-grid-2] How to properly accommodate margin/border/padding of a subgrid with no item on the edges
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7465#issuecomment-1265913276
Proposed Resolution: Simplify to single-span hypothetical items only Alternative Resolution: Spec applying "magic margin" to outermost items, not just items in outermost tracks
CSS Box Alignment
-----------------
8. [css-align] *-items properties might need to resolve directions early
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7612#issuecomment-1230963091
WG Action: Review and confirm whether summary reflects desired behavior
9. [css-align] align-self / justify-self on abspos elements isn't back compatible?
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7599
WG Action: Consider whether we want to use staticpos containing block instead of abspos containing block to resolve alignment properties on statically positioned abspos
10. [css-flexbox] Investigate applying align-content to single-line flex containers
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3052#issuecomment-1226112918
Proposed Resolution: Closed no change, add to list of mistakes, see
11. [css-align-3][css-multicol-1] First baseline of a multicol WG Action: Consider and choose one of the options
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7856
CSS Tables
----------
12. [css-tables] Allow 'order' on table columns WG Question: Do we want to do this (and therefore task fremy with adding it to the spec)?
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7340#issuecomment-1247390415
Thanks,
Rossen
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2022 03:42:53 UTC