Agenda+ [css-sizing-3] Intrinsic sizing section re-review request

Hi everyone!

The TFTF (Tab and Fantasai Task Force) has been working on fixing up the 
intrinsic sizing section of the CSS Sizing Level 3 module 
<https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-3/#intrinsic>. We fixed a number of clear 
errors, and worked through some additional issues with Blink and Gecko 
engineers. There's one issue still open that we hope to resolve shortly [1] 
but otherwise we think we're pretty much ready to publish a new working draft, 
issue a last call for comments, and transition to CR.

However, we would like to get one last review on the intrinsic sizing section 
in particular to make sure we're all OK with what it says:
   https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-3/#intrinsic
We think a holistic review of the section is a better idea than dragging the 
entire WG through all of the individual issues that were fixed.

[1] https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5665#issuecomment-797046688

Other notable (closed) issues:

* https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6072 and 
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6073 These both covered the 
definition of min-content and max-content sizes and contributions in some cases.
* https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4961 Reminder about the 
terminology change splitting "intrinsic size" and "natural size"; specs should 
all be using the terms correctly now, so this is just a heads up.

~fantasai and Tab

Received on Friday, 12 March 2021 22:41:14 UTC